Business Law

write for 2 pages :Here what I want you use in my papeer, I want you write this in my perer step by step :1- Issue2.Rule3- Analysis4-Conclusion5- What you learned6-Content and Quality ConnectionsHere the explain about that i need in that paper .This will be the rubric used to evaluate your case submissions with the one exception that is noted in the Module 5.IRAC Grading RubricIRAC/Case Analysis RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsIssueview longer descriptionClearly identifies the relevant issue of the case5 ptsIdentifies the issue but is not a clear and concise statement4 ptsCan see an issue but does not properly address it3 ptsHaving difficulty concentrating on the issue.2 ptsDoes not understand the issue1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkRuleview longer descriptionConcisely states the rule5 ptsMostly states the rule4 ptsPartially states the rule3 ptsVaguely states the rule2 ptsDoes not state the correct rule1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkAnalysisview longer descriptionClearly shows an understanding how the law applies to the facts.5 ptsStates how the facts and the law relate4 ptsDoes not clearly state how the facts and law relate3 ptsDoes not connect the facts or the law2 ptsUnable to apply the law to the facts1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkConclusionview longer descriptionClearly and Concisely states the conclusion5 ptsStates a good conclusion4 ptsStates a conclusion that is not concise but still on point3 ptsStates a conclusion2 ptsDoes not state a conclusion1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkWhat you learnedview longer descriptionClearly states what the case taught you5 ptsStates what the case is about (paraphrases case)4 ptsStates the case verbatim or interjected personal feelings into the response3 ptsStates ideas not connected to the case2 ptsDid not understand the case.1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkContent and Quality Connectionsview longer descriptionResponse is thoughtful, contains substantive insight and analysis in relation to topic. makes strong connections to readings, lecture, experience, workplace5 ptsResponse(s) demonstrate significant understanding. Robust insight and analysis. Evidence of connections.4 ptsContent response is accurate but superficial. Some responses may be off topic. Acknowledges connections exist.3 ptsLacks depth; responses too general, conclusory, simplistic in nature. Some aspects of response are off topic. Posts lack connections.2 ptsInterjected emotional responses, personal feelings, and /or beliefs in analysis1 ptsNo Marks0 ptsptsDelete Criterion LinkTotal Points: 30______________________________________________________Here the homework :M5 Discussion (Original Post)Walter AyersDec 31, 2013 at 11:15am33The case for this discussion is Stoll v. Runyon. (link at the bottom of the page)After reading the case, assume you are a coworker of Cynthia Stoll, You  have just witnessed some of the coworkers behavior towards her.  What do should you do?Assume you are her supervisor and just became informed of this behavior, what would you do?Assume  you  are the Human Resources Director, what would you do?Assume you are the in house counsel what advice would you give?You must be objective and NOT  insert your personal beliefs in the answer.  Use the IRAC analytical format to  respond to each separate issue you find (there are more issues than listed)”You may do additional internet research,  the search terms “Sexual Harassment” and/or “Washington State” will be helpfulResponse Posts: Respond to the posts of at least 2 other students.Note: The student response for this case is due three weeks from today.It is preferred if you prepare your response in Word and upload the file.  Use spell and grammar check and have Word  check the document for readability before uploading.  Please include the readability score  with your submission.Stoll v. Runyon.pdf