Interrogation

In the second phase of the interrogation process, there are several outcome-based tactics that may be used to obtain a confession. These outcome-based tactics are methods exercised by investigators to persuade the suspect to cooperate and confess. These methods or tactics may include the following aspects:Appealing to the suspect’s self-interestConfronting the suspect with evidence of guiltUndermining the suspect’s confidence in his or her denialsIdentifying contradictions in the suspect’s alibi or storyAsking specific behavioral analysis interview questionsAppealing to the importance of cooperationOffering moral justifications and face-saving excusesConfronting the suspect with false evidence of guiltPraising or flattering the suspectAppealing to the detective’s expertise and authoritySubmission Details:On the basis of what you have learned in the course, by Wednesday, January 28, 2015, in a minimum of 250 words, post to the Discussion Area your response to the following:Discuss three of the most effective interrogation techniques. Justify your position by creating scenarios in which you may use each technique. Include the legal implications that will need to be considered when executing each technique.Discussion Grading Criteria and Rubric:All discussion assignments in this course will be graded using a rubric. This assignment is worth 40 points. Download the discussion rubric and carefully read it to understand the expectations.