PSY 605 week 4 Discussion

Prior to completing this discussion, read the required materials from the Shaffer (2011) text, as well as the Berzonsky (2004), Fiese (2013), and Burkitt (2010) articles.
Review the PSY605: Mila Singer Life Story document. Choose one aspect of Mila’s life to alter. This element can be an event, a personal characteristic, an environmental factor, or an aspect of the timeline. In your initial post, identify the original life story element you intend to change and explain how you intend to change it. Use Erikson’s psychosocial stages of development to explain Mila’s stage of development at the time this change takes place and address how the change affects Mila’s psychological development into adulthood.
After identifying the initial change and describing it, create a list of three additional outcomes in Mila’s development across the lifespan that will likely be affected by this change. For each, identify the current outcome in Mila’s life story and propose a rationale for changing this outcome. Apply either Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory or Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory to Mila’s life to create a hypothesis as to how and why these outcomes would likely adjust due to the changes you have made. 
Briefly summarize your personal reaction(s) to making the initial change and how it altered the subsequent outcomes. Explain how differences in life events create differences in human development.

please make sure to follow the system of analysis which means that you have to understand systemic and sub- systemic paradigms.

Use a topic which is post 9/11 and post cold war ( do something in 90s topic for post-cold war)
-please make sure to follow the system of analysis which means that you have to understand systemic and sub- systemic paradigms.
– If you don’t follow this system i will get F and I will report for refund because the professor only care about levels of analysis.
-Select any issue from international
affairs that involves a difference of
opinion.
-Use levels-of-analysis to explain which
side should prevail.
Or use them to explain why an event happened
the way that it did.
Provide a theoretical ethos to support your view.
for conclusion you can say for example ”
Dropping the bomb was bad or good idea for conclusion ” etc..
attachmentquiznotes.pdf

An isotope of the element Thallium TI-206, undergoes beta decay with a half life of 3.1 minutes. Assume you begin with 1.0 grams of the thallium…

An isotope of the element Thallium TI-206, undergoes beta decay with a half life of 3.1 minutes. Assume you begin with 1.0 grams of the thallium isotope what mass of the isotope will be left after 9.3 minutes have elapsed?The post An isotope of the element Thallium TI-206, undergoes beta decay with a half life of 3.1 minutes. Assume you begin with 1.0 grams of the thallium… first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

Bipolar disorder: early detection and risk factors

While researchers don’t yet fully understand the exact cause of bipolar disorder, they have identified certain factors which may increase your risk of developing the disorder.
Roughly 2.6% of Americans will experience the condition known as bipolar disorder Characterized by extreme highs and lows in mood, bipolar disorder can disrupt daily life when not treated effectively.  Also, because the disorder can increase the risk of substance use, suicide, and other risky behaviors, it’s important to diagnose and treat the disorder as early as possible. Knowing the causes and risk factors of bipolar disorder can help with early detection and treatment.
There is no known exact cause of bipolar disorder. Researchers have yet to find the exact genes that contribute to the disorder or understand exactly how the brain physically changes when the disorder is present. Researchers, however, do have a sense of what factors increase your risk of developing the disorder. The disease is highly heritable, so having a family member with the condition increases the risk greatly. While people are genetically predisposed to be at risk of the disorder, not all of these people develop bipolar disorder. This suggests that environmental factors and psychological factors can trigger manic or depressive episodes, although not everyone with the disorder will experience a triggering event.
Genetics and bipolar disorder
People are more likely to develop bipolar disorder if they have a close relative with the condition.
Individuals are also more likely to develop bipolar disorder if they have another mental health condition, such as depression or schizophrenia.
Some research suggests that the lifetime risk of bipolar disorder in relatives of someone with the condition is 5–10 percent for a close relative and 40–70 percent for a twin.
However, scientists do not fully understand the role that genes play in bipolar disorder.
According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), some studies indicate that irregularities in many genes combine to increase a person’s chance of bipolar disorder. The exact way that this occurs remains unclear.
It is likely that just having a genetic predisposition to the disorder is not enough to trigger its development. Environmental factors may also be necessary to trigger symptoms in people with the relevant gene variations.
It is also important to note that just because someone has a greater chance of having bipolar disorder, it does not mean that they will go on to develop it.
ResearchTrusted Source suggests that the majority of people with a genetic predisposition are healthy, and most people with a relative who has bipolar disorder do not have the condition themselves.
Risk Factors
Family with the Disorder
If you have a relative in your nuclear family with bipolar disorder, such as a parent or sibling, then you may be at higher risk for the mood disorder. Symptoms may first emerge during teenage years or early adulthood, with the average of onset being 25. One analysis of the literature found that children of parents with a severe mental illness had roughly a one-third chance of developing a severe mental illness by adulthood. Researchers have also found that the earlier age your parent is diagnosed with the disorder, the higher your risk is for also developing it.
However, we know that genetics isn’t the only factor. Studies of identical twins have shown that while bipolar disorder is very heritable, both twins will not always develop the disorder. This means that environmental factors can play a role as well in increasing or decreasing risk of developing the condition.
High Stress
People who experience traumatic events are at higher risk for developing bipolar disorder. Childhood factors such as sexual or physical abuse, neglect, the death of a parent, or other traumatic events can increase the risk of bipolar disorder later in life. Highly stressful events such as losing a job, moving to a new place, or experiencing a death in the family can also trigger manic or depressive episodes. Lack of sleep can also increase risk of a manic episode.
Substance Abuse
People who abuse drugs or alcohol are also at risk for developing bipolar disorder. Substance use doesn’t cause the disorder, but it can make mood episodes worse or hasten the onset of symptoms. Sometimes medications can also trigger the onset of a manic or depressive episode. However, because substance use can trigger psychosis, a person may have to detox from substances before a doctor can give them a diagnosis of bipolar disorder.
Gender
Bipolar disorder affects men and woman equally, but women are three times more likely to experience rapid cycling of mood episodes. They are also more likely to experience depressive and mixed episodes of the disorder compared to men.
If you’re not sure whether you’re at risk for bipolar disorder, you can ask yourself the following questions:

Has anyone in your family been diagnosed with bipolar disorder or another mental illness?
Have you experienced childhood trauma?
Have you experienced recent stressful events or lack of sleep?
Have you noticed extreme changes in mood after using drugs or alcohol?
Have extreme mood changes impacted your work, daily responsibilities, or relationships?

Even if you answer “no” to all these questions, you can still talk to your doctor or a mental health professional about your concerns and receive a diagnostic evaluation. If you have the disorder and are concerned about the risks for your own children, consult with a professional about the risks and what interventions can help your child maintain good mental health.
Above all, remember that bipolar disorder is very treatable, and medication, therapy, and other interventions can play a huge role in managing symptoms and slowing rapid mood changes. Talk to someone today who can help you get started on the right path towards a healthier daily life.
 
 
 
 

Abstract (two sentences: one goes over the summary, and one covers your analysis.)

studenstudents will turn in a current event wistudents will turn in a current event with a policy synopsis attached. Students should look for domestic and international events that affect American Government. Students should use reputable sources including but not limited to: The Guardian, Al-Jazeera, The BBC, Reuters, Associated Press, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg News,The Financial Times, The Independent UK, The Christian Science Monitor, The New York Times, The Washington Post, or others. Students should try to avoid MSNBC, Fox News, or CNN as these websites are geared towards viewership and not investigative journalism. Other sites like Mashable, OffTheGridNews, Washington Times, Breitbart, etc should be used with extreme vetting and caution. Students will write a policy briefing on the current event.
Current Event 1
Instructions:
1. Include the link in the current event
2. The synopsis should be in three sections (maybe even just three paragraphs if you’re concise)
a. Abstract (two sentences: one goes over the summary, and one covers your analysis.)
b. Summary (summarize the article: include the authors, title of piece, major points and quotes)
c. Analysis (your own thoughts: use one tool of analysis)th a policy synopsis attached. Students should look for domestic and international events that affect American Government. Students should use reputable sources including but not limited to: The Guardian, Al-Jazeera, The BBC, Reuters, Associated Press, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg News,The Financial Times, The Independent UK, The Christian Science Monitor, The New York Times, The Washington Post, or others. Students should try to avoid MSNBC, Fox News, or CNN as these websites are geared towards viewership and not investigative journalism. Other sites like Mashable, OffTheGridNews, Washington Times, Breitbart, etc should be used with extreme vetting and caution. Students will write a policy briefing on the current event.
Current Event 1

Wk 5 disc 2

Read the “Numbers Can be Worth a Thousand Pictures: Individual Differences in Understanding Graphical and Numerical Representations of Health-Related Information” article prior to answering. Informed decision making in the mental health and medical professions requires the ability to understand and effectively communicate statistical information.  For this discussion, address the following in your post:

Select one mental health disorder of your choice based on a valid diagnostic category in the DSM-5.
Research the disorder and locate relevant statistics obtained within the past 7 years regarding overall prevalence, gender and age differences, and treatment options.
Present this information in the discussion forum in two formats: Format 1 for individuals with high graph literacy; Format 2: for individuals with low graphic literacy but high numerical literacy.  Information regarding each of these two formats is discussed in the assigned article.
Be sure to include your references in your discussion post, that are formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
The post Wk 5 disc 2 first appeared on Nursing School Essays.

The case with the NFL and marijuana use amongst players show why federal sanctions are definitely necessary.

have to reply to two students discussion post
4 sentences maxed
#1
I think a unitary government would be too similar to a monarchy for the citizens to agree to. There are too many differing opinions and too many people in the country for that form of government to work well. We come form people who tend to overthrow monarchies, so I think it would just be a huge mess eventually. Although, it does seem like the federal government is trying to move towards a more unitary form of government. I do think that if the US had the same traffic laws for every state, moving around the country would be much easier. It is so frustrating to drive through a state not knowing if you are doing anything illegal on the roads. I do think that the government needs to get out of education. Education is so regionally impacted, there is no way the government would/should be able to set federal mandates regarding the education system. At the biggest, it should be state-by-state, preferably by region or county though.
#2
Federal sanctions have both good and bad outcomes. The case with the NFL and marijuana use amongst players show why federal sanctions are definitely necessary. NFL players have severe pains after matches and practices with the vigorous sport. Most players turn to marijuana use instead of hard pain killers that really on numbs the pain, where as players have described using marijuana for pain relief as better because it has no bad side effects. Now the reason it should be federally sanctioned is because some players may only want to use for recreational purposes and because of this the NFL cannot condone since possession of the drug is still a federal crime.

A sample consisting of 1.0 mol of a a Van der walls is compressed from 20.0dm3 to10.0 dm3 at 300K. In the process, 20.2KJof workis done on the gas ….

A sample consisting of 1.0 mol of a a Van der walls is compressed from 20.0dm3 to10.0 dm3 at 300K. In the process, 20.2KJof workis done on the gas . Given u ={(2a/RT) – b}/Cp,m; with Cp,m = 38.4j/K.mol; a=3.60dm6 atm and b= 0.44 dm3.mol. calculate DeltaH for the process.

Prescribe a solution to a problem the author raises, or propose a better solution than the author gives

Constitution Writing Assignment
Use two tools of analysis for better understanding of Constitution. Choose a Clause or Amendment and analyze.
Instructions: Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the amendment with an example or two. Then describe how the amendment is relevant (or irrelevant) today. Include an opening sentence that grabs attention. I grade based on the quality of the analysis, the supporting evidence/examples, grammar, structure, organization, and clarity. That being said this assignment is not done until it has completed its purpose; in this case using two types of analyses to develop further understanding.
Here’s a PDF of the Constitution. https://rccd.instructure.com/courses/8409/files/389689/download?download_frd=1
Example: Thesis might look like: This essay identifies the important amendment ______. The amendment is relevant today because of ______________ . An example of this is _____________. When looking at the amendment’s relevance today, I feel ____________ about the amendment, because __________.
Tools of Analysis
•Compare and contrast (two or three sections of a piece)
•Compare and contrast (with outside information/experts such as academic experts, politicians, textbooks, and other professional sources)
•Apply to something you know (pop culture, other text, experience, historical examples, other material)
•Reinterpret (put the author’s ideas into your own words, communicate their point in a new way)
•Relevance (does the author’s ideas apply to something going on today?)
•Argue for (provide several examples why the author is correct)
•Argue against (provide at least one example why the author is incorrect)
•Proscribe (criticize the author or the piece)
•Prescribe a solution to a problem the author raises, or propose a better solution than the author gives
•Identify if author has a bias and explain with examples

One of the biggest decisions that any healthcare organization can make today is the selection of a new healthcare information system.

One of the biggest decisions that any healthcare organization can make today is the selection of a new healthcare information system. With so many options available today, how would you go about selecting the best information system for your own community hospital facility? Whom would you involve in the analysis and decision-making process? Finally, what criteria would you use in making the final choice for a new system?