Ethical considerations in nursing research

/in /by

Ethical considerations in nursing research

DQ

/in /by

Discuss the shift to value-based health care and its impact on the roles and responsibilities of advanced registered nurses. What major evolving trends in the health care delivery system will affect your practice in the next 3-5 years, and how do you think advanced registered nurses will continue to influence the direction of health care?

Create a 10 to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation, with speaker’s notes, communicating the change vision of the policy issue you selected.The policy issue selected: (Prescription drug abus

/in /by

Create a 10 to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation, with speaker’s notes, communicating the change vision of the policy issue you selected.

The policy issue selected: (Prescription drug abuse )

Locate a minimum of three academic articles to support your stance. Two of the three articles can be previous resources used in earlier weeks.

Include the following in your presentation:-Summarize the problem statement using relevant background information and supporting details from the articles you located. 

-Identify the policy objectives, options, and alternatives. 

-Who is directly impacted by the health policy issue?

-Identify the stakeholders who will assist you in implementing the change and define their roles.

-What are the outside influences on the policy issue?

-How has the media’s influence shaped the policy?

-How will the policy change improve health care?

-Are there any cultural or ethical implications to this policy?

Cite and reference using APA guidelines.

Law Homework

/in /by

Assignment Evaluating Funding Requests: Juvenile Boot Camp ProgramsCentervale councilman Pete Parsimonious has received funding requests for two competing juvenile corrections boot camp programs and requires your assistance on how to evaluate program success through appropriate research. There is a general perception that one of the two programs is only marginally successful while the other succeeds through much lower recidivism rates. Of course, the director for each program cites the outstanding success of his or her program in the funding application but fails to provide any research data to support these claims.The intent of this assignment is to help you refer to empirical-based observations that can be quantitative (e.g., expressed as numbers) or qualitative (e.g., expressed as objects, words, or pictures)—specifically, the assignment will help you understand why one boot camp excels over the other in statistical terms particularly relating to lower recidivism rates.Tasks:Conduct research related to juvenile justice boot camp programs using the Online Library resources, the National Institute of Justice Data Collections, or the National Criminal Justice Reference Service Databases.Look for potential pitfalls in boot camp programs. Select two articles from your research that have taken different approaches to evaluate boot camp programs.Based on the programs you read about, prepare a memo. In the memo:Describe the research approaches and types of data that were utilized in each of the two studies.Identify any ethical issues Parsimonious should be concerned about as a city councilman making a recommendation to invest public funds in a program of this type. Provide the reason for your choice.Discuss whether either of these approaches should be recommended to Parsimonious and support your position based on the effectiveness and impact of the program. You might also comment on the setbacks or failure issues if reported in the studies you have chosen.Be sure to cite the resources you used in the APA style.RUBRICAssignment Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsDescribed the research approaches and types of data used in each of the studies.16Analyzed and justified the ethical issues that Parsimonious should be concerned about.20Analyzed and justified the approach that should be recommended to Parsimonious and stated any setback or failure issues reported in the research studies.28Cited resources in the APA format.16Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in the accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.20Total:100

assignment brief form.

/in /by

This assignment is due today at 6:15 PM (pacific time) So in about 5 hours.You only have to read the case that is in this link ->   http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1639671.htmland fill out the form that is attatched. Please answer each box thoroughly.

NEED it by midnight jan 17

/in /by

Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper explaining critical issues in policing. Address the following key aspects of policing activities and operations:Dangers of policingLess-than-lethal weaponsTechnology used in policingIssues of homeland security and law enforcement relationshipsOne additional critical issue in policing that is of interest to youExplain the issue.Explain how the issue is relevant to this paper.Include information learned from the CJi Interactive activities in your paper.Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Delilah Martindale is a married, 42- year old woman with 3 children and works as a part-time cashier at Circle K. She has never smoked and has an occasional social drink. Her past medical history in

/in /by

Delilah Martindale is a married, 42- year old woman with 3 children and works as a part-time cashier at Circle K.  She has never smoked and has an occasional social drink.  Her past medical history includes plastic surgery for bilateral breast implants done 3 years ago and tonsillectomy when she was 10 years old.  Her mother is a breast cancer survivor and her father died of lung cancer two years ago.  When she returned for a physical check up with her primary MD, a lump was noted on her Right breast.  Her physician ordered an outpatient breast biopsy as soon as possible that revealed presence of malignant cells.  She elected to have R breast removed with axillary lymph node dissection.

1.              Delilah Martindale wants you to explain exactly what Stage IV: T4 N3 M1 mean.  Based on the TNM Classification System, what will you tell her?  (½ point)

2.              Discuss the treatment modalities that Delilah Martindale may have other than the surgical procedure as mentioned in the case scenario.  (2 points)

3.              Define metastasis and discuss its pathophysiologic mechanism. Based on the location of her malignancy, where are the sites of metastasis? (2 points)

4.              Discuss the clinical manifestations of cancer, etiology, and general effects of malignancy that Delilah Martindale may or may not experience.  (2 points)

5.              Delilah Martindale is to receive chemotherapy. Discuss the effects of chemotherapy to the body cells, both cancerous and non-cancerous. (½ point)

6.              Describe the side effects of cancer therapy and possible treatment or ways to alleviate the discomforts or complications of these side effects. (2 points)

7.              List the health education or teachings that you would provide the community or the public regarding the prevention of breast cancer. (1 point)   

Prof. Dan

/in /by

Prof. Dan

constitutional law

/in /by

For this assignment we are going to look at the relevance of the Constitution and its constitutional protections in contemporary American society. First, research the history of the Right to Counsel in the United States. You may use the sources provided in this unit, as well as your text for this assignment.Next, draft a short essay explaining the development of the Right to Counsel in the U.S. Consider the historical developments in the U.S. legal system that made it more difficult for a person to represent him or herself in a criminal case. Discuss at least three elements of this right and provide examples.Your paper should be 3-4 pages long, double-spaced in 10-12 point font (Arial, Courier, and Times New Roman are acceptable). Submit your paper to the Dropbox by the end of Unit 7.The viewpoint and purpose of this 3 – 4 page assignment should be clearly established and sustained. Assignment should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.). Your writing should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics. Use the appropriate citation style for all citations. More details can be found in the GEL 1.1 Universal Writing Rubric.

Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6: Case Study Choice. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is

/in /by

Choose one of the Case Studies from Chapter 13 using the Week 6: Case Study Choice. Please summarize the case and discuss the questions that are asked with the case study presentation. Although it is not specifically asked, make sure that you are including aspects of immobility from Chapter 25 within the answers to the questions, and drawing ABGs on your patient, relaying the results (note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study.

The case study I picked is : Cystic Fibrosis

Discussion Question Rubric

Note: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.

Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplaryExceeds ExpectationsAdvancedMeets ExpectationsIntermediateNeeds ImprovementNoviceInadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.

Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.

All instruction requirements noted.

40 pointsComponents are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.

Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.

Cites two references.

35 pointsComponents are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.

Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.

Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.

Most instruction requirements are noted.

31 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

No references cited.

Missing several instruction requirements.

Submits post late.

27 points40Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.

All instruction requirements noted.

40 pointsEvidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.

Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.

All instruction requirements noted.

35 pointsLacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.

Missing reference from one peer post.

Partially followed instructions regarding number of reply posts.

Most instruction requirements are noted.

31 pointsPost is primarily a summation of peer’s post without further synthesis of course content.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

Did not follow instructions regarding number of reply posts.

Missing reference from peer posts.

Missing several instruction requirements.

Submits post late.

27 points40Frequency of DistributionInitial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days.

All instruction requirements noted.

10 pointsInitial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days.

8 pointsMinimum of two post options (initial and/or peer) made on separate days.

7 pointsAll posts made on same day.

Submission demonstrates inadequate preparation.

No post submitted.

6 points10OrganizationWell-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise with a logical flow of ideas

5 pointsOrganized content with an informative purpose statement, supportive content, and summary statement. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow.

4 pointsPoor organization and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work.

Purpose statement is noted.

3 pointsIllogical flow of ideas. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing.

Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.

No purpose statement.

Submits assignment late.

2 points5APA, Grammar, and SpellingCorrect APA formatting with no errors.

The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately).

Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.

There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors.

5 pointsCorrect and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used. No more than two unique APA errors.

The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability.

There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.

4 pointsThree to four unique APA formatting errors.

The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused.

Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors.

3 pointsFive or more unique formatting errors or no attempt to format in APA.

The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language).

The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented.

Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous.

Submits assignment late.

2 points5Total Points100

Edit question’s body

  • CysticFibrosisCaseStudy.jpg

Edit question’s attachments

Case Summary

Paraphrase the questions in your chosen case as subheadings

Do not use numbers and do not copy and paste the questions

Aspects of immobility

Drawing ABGs and relaying the results

(note you will need to make up what would be considered appropriate ABG results based on this case), and what those results mean in relation to your case study