Thinking points : 1.Look for the connections between prejudice/discrimination on the spread of diseases.  2. Think about why the fight against diseases cannot be purely medical. Discuss why psychology

Thinking points :

1.Look for the connections between prejudice/discrimination on the spread of diseases. 

2. Think about why the fight against diseases cannot be purely medical. Discuss why psychology and sociology are important as well. 

3. How does this change the way you look at diseases or public healthcare trends in the world. 

4. How does this awareness help you become a better citizen of the world and a better healthcare worker.

5. Use personal experiences, recent global events, and/or local happenings in your discussion. 

International Legal and Ethical Issues in Business Unit 2 IP

Read the following scenario about Mary. Based upon the information in the text and your own online research, discuss Mary’s ethical options. What do you think that she should do?Mary recently graduated from college and landed her first corporate job. She works as an administrative assistant for an international corporation that manufactures home decorations in the USA and Europe. On many occasions she had had to travel to Europe to assist company executives conduct business in a wide variety of countries. She had a primary boss in the USA and many secondary bosses in a variety of European countries. On the job only four months, Mary feels that she is already starting to loose her idealism about business. She has heard of and observed employees coming to work intoxicated – even sneaking drinks at work. She has seen employees routinely arrive late for work and leave early. Fifteen minute breaks and thirty minute lunches often last twice as long.Employees routinely use their computers for sending and receiving personal emails, shopping online, checking horoscopes, and the weather, even gambling. And all of that happened in just her department in the USA and Europe. The department manager is very laid back. Mary has tried to talk with him about these problems, but he seems unable or unwilling to confront the problems. It appears to Mary that he wants the employees to like him, and the employees are taking advantage of that. Mary is growing more and more frustrated. She prides herself as a hard worker and assumed the other employees would be too. Mary is tempted to give up and join the other employees, getting paid for doing as little as possible. But she knows that she would not be able to respect herself. She is tempted to go over her managers’ head to his supervisor and complain about the problems. But that would alienate her direct supervisors and the other employees. She has not been at the company long enough to request a transfer, and quitting her job after four months does not seem like a good career move. She is sitting at her desk wondering what she should do.In response to this scenario, answer the following questions:Using the internet, the library, and your textbook, compare and contrast the rights of employees and the responsibilities of employers in the United States and Europe. Are the laws, customs, and cultures different?If Mary chooses to file a formal complaint with a government agency, what challenges will she face?What kind of reaction will Mary get from her supervisors in the United States and Europe?Finally, advise Mary on what course of action she should take.

excellent_A_tutor

Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:Analyze both the court system’s likely view on the accused’s rights, as well as the court system’s likely treatment of the defendant during trial proceedings. Provide support for the analysis.Assuming the accused is ultimately sentenced to a term of imprisonment, depict the most likely experience the defendant will have within the country’s prison system. Provide justification for your view of the country’s prison system.Expose two (2) ethical concerns you witnessed regarding the country’s court and correctional systems.Provide one (1) recommendation for change within each of the systems (court and correctional). Provide justification for the recommendations.Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Evaluate and explain ethical issues inherent in criminal justice systems.Differentiate the role of courts in various societies and in international context.Compare international perspectives on corrections and criminal punishment, including comparative sentencing typologies.Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice.Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

research paper using the attached text on corporation structure

Research paper ( using the attached lecture notes ” structure of corporation”)——————————–Topic:-Identify and explain all the important parts of a large, publicly traded corporation’s governance structure.  Then discuss how such a corporation is controlled internally – in theory,  and in fact.Identify and explain the main risks that large, publicly traded corporations poseTo their employeesTo the economy at largeTo the communities they have facilities inTo the environmentand explain how the corporate structure makes those risks larger than they would be if having the corporate form and the possibility of millions of investors were not an option.Make sure that you footnote copiously,  using Chicago style with full information footnotes at the bottom of the page. EACH fact gets its own footnote.  There is no specific word limit,  but being overly vague or general  will not yield good results,  and neither will being wordy.    The way you ORGANIZE your paper WILL count for part of your grade, as will the quality of your research,  and the sufficiency.   Instructions for Chicago Style footnotes can be found in the Marist Online Library.  Go to Research Tools>Reference Shelf>Citation Styles (blue tab)>Chicago/Turabian>Chicago Manual of Style Online.Make sure your upload is a WORD document.   Make sure it is ONE single Word document….do not create a bibliography as a separate document.  Make the bibliography PART of your answer document.Once you’ve researched and written it, leave it for a day, then come back and edit it.  The way or ORGANIZE your paper WILL count for part of your grade,  as usual,  as will the quality of your research and the sufficiency of your footnotes.

For Puja Only

How does the progression from grade to grade indicate adequate progress, based on the court’s definition?I have problems with the answer for this DQ.Please a tutors with the knowledge on the subject.I just need 250- 300 words.

Georgia & Florida Judicial Selection Process

Assignment 1: The State Judicial Selection ProcessEach state within the United States has its own unique judicial selection process within its own court system.Research the judicial selection process for different court systems from different states within the U.S. Court System.Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you:1.     Discuss the judicial selection process of GEORGIA. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within GEORGIA.2.     Describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within FLORIDA.3.     Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.4.     Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response.5.     Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.The assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.Must be original work!Must be plagiarism free!Must be grammatical error free!I have Grammarly, so make sure you correct your grammer errors and plagiarism before sending it to me.**The person requesting a handshake must be from the US and must reside in the US.**

Imagine that you own each of the following buisness

Imagine that you own each of the following businesses:Tinker’s Home Security Service (sole proprietorship)Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service (general partnership)Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service (LP)Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service, Inc. (corporation)Tinker & Tailor’s Home Security Service, LLC (LLC)The businesses are being sued for breach of contract. Create a matrix that lists each business, and compare and contrast your personal liability exposure as an owner as a result of the lawsuit.For each business entity, analyze how you might limit your liability exposure as an owner.Describe a business that you may own some day or that you currently own. (Even if you never plan to own a business, pretend as if you will do so for the purposes of this assignment.) Examine the best business organizational form for the business that you have described, including in your examination personal liability exposure, management, taxation, and ease of formation.Submit a four- to five-page paper (not including title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the approved APA style guide and you must cite at least three scholarly sources in addition to the textbook.Carefully review the

3-4 pagraphs with references please and no plagirazm

Another important aspect of completing your research project is to effectively present the issue to any stakeholders involved or anyone with an interest in the chosen issue.Write 3–4 paragraphs that address the following points:Provide some tips that you plan to use for effectively presenting your research findings and proposed solution to your specific audience.How would you determine who your audience is?What would you choose as your method of presentation (e.g., lecture format, informal question & answer session, hybrid of more than one method, etc.)? Explain why would you choose that method.In your answer, be sure to share with your peers how you would present your research statement, and provide a rationale for choosing that method.

Analyze the link between criminals and terrorists and explain how their networks may overlap. Provide examples to support your response.

please cite work accordingly. Apa format

Overview: Peer ReviewIn the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about Peer Review Committee processes and Texas Board of Nursing rules as you consider the actio

Overview: Peer Review

In the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about Peer Review Committee processes and Texas Board of Nursing rules as you consider the actions of fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.

ALSO, THERE ARE 2 PARTS TO THIS ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU COMPLETE BOTH PARTS.

Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.

Performance Objectives: 

· Apply the Minor Incident Rule to specific incidents.

· Describe the due process protections for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.

Rubric 

Use this rubric to guide your work on the assignment, “Peer Review.”

Task

Accomplished

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Part 1 (a)

 Applying Rule 217.16

   (Total 50 points) 

Lists all the correct 5 criteria, accurately explains application of   criteria clearly. (25 points)

Lists 3 or 4 of the   correct criteria, accurately explains application of these criteria

 (15 points)

Lists 2 applications of criteria.

 10 points)

Incorrectly lists criteria (0   point)

Part   1 (b)

 Reflects upon applications 

   of Rule 217.16

   (Total 25 points) 

Correctly states if nurse should be reported or not reported with 3 substantial sentences. (25 points)

Correctly states if nurse should be reported or not reported with 2 sentences.

 (15 point)

Writes 1 sentence.

 (10 points)

Incorrectly judges whether violations occurred (0 point)

Part   2

Violation of IBPR Rule 217.19 (Total   25 points)

Correctly listed the 4 violations and provides correct explanations (25 points)

Correctly lists 2-3 violations and explanations (15 points)

Lists 1 violation and explanation (10 points)

Incorrectly lists criteria (0 point)

All 5 questions correct (25 points)

4 questions correct (20 points)

3 questions correct (15 points)

2 questions correct (10 points)

1 question correct (5 points)

0 questions correct (0 point)

Part 1: (a) Applying Rule 217.16(h) Minor Incidents

Read the following scenario and then answer the questions that follow:

You are on your hospital’s Peer Review Committee (PRC). You are reviewing Nurse A’s practice. She works on the pediatric unit. In the past, Nurse A has practiced safely without incidents. However, four months ago, Nurse A gave immunizations to five pediatric patients (3 months, 9 months, 2 years, 4 years, and 5 years of age). She used a vial of Hepatitis B vaccine that had been expired for 30 days but still was being stored in the unit refrigerator. She gave the five immunizations within a few minutes of each other, and she got the vial from the refrigerator only once (i.e., She did not take it out and replace it five times). She took responsibility for the errors when she was informed by her unit manager. 

Should Nurse A be reported to the BON?

Let’s review what deems a minor vs. a reportable (NOT minor) incident- 

A minor incident is- 217.16(a)-  as defined under the Texas Nursing Practice Act, Texas Occupations Code §301.401(2), means conduct by a nurse that may be a violation of the Texas Nursing Practice Act or a Board rule but does not indicate the nurse’s continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person. 

A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.

Apply the Minor Incident Rule to reach and support your decision. This Rule 217.16 can be found at http://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp

Use this specific link only- it is the official updated Texas Board of Nursing information. Click on the link and scroll down to the bottom to find the letter (h), where criteria are listed that describes actions that must be reported to the Peer Review Committee or BON.

Criteria. In the first column of the table, list the 5 criteria as it appears in the rule that are essential in determining if an incident is a reportable action. All 5 must be listed for full credit. Then, in the second column, record your explanation as to why or why not the nurse’s actions deem it reportable and therefore harmful to a patient.

Criteria that determine an incident is reportable

Rule 217.16(h)

Explanation of whether or not Nurse A’s actions are minor vs. reportable

Criteria : 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

Part 1: (b) Report vs. Not Report

Based on the Rule 217.16(h) criteria you listed above, would you report Nurse A to the Board? Please explain why or why not. At least 3 substantial sentences are needed for full credit.:       (Explain below)

Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review 

Read the following scenario and then reflect upon the actions it portrays.:

Last month, the chairperson of your hospital’s Peer Review Committee (PRC) passed you in the hallway and said, “I’m glad I ran into you. You’re going to be peer-reviewed.” The chairperson continued, saying, “Your manager found out that you called the Texas Department of State Health Services two months ago and reported that LVNs were being allowed to do the complete initial assessment on patients. Also, you made some medication errors over the past couple of months. I’ll let you know when the meeting is to occur.” 

You heard nothing more about the PRC meeting. Today, the chairperson came to you and told you that you had been reported to the Texas Board of Nursing. She said, “It was just felt by the work group that you are a troublemaker and lack the skills to practice due to your med errors. I’m also giving you a ‘heads up’ that you are going to be put on suspension for at least three days by your unit manager.”

Applying Rule 217.19, what violations of the rule occurred in the above scenario? 

First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. In the first column of the table, list any 4 criteria from Rule 217.19 that were violated (there are more than 4 to choose from). 

1-

2-

3-

4-

In the second column, explain how each criterion was violated. All 4 boxes must be completed for full credit. Please use the link provided at http://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp

Which part of the rule was violated? 

(Subsection number and letter OR descriptive phrase)

(Rule 217.19)

Explanation of violation ( from the 4 criteria above):

1.  

2.  

3.  

4.